Noontime Presentation at the Alaska State Museum
February 16, 2011
This was a lecture for the general public, part of our brown bag lunch lecture series this winter. Approximately 40 people attended, and about 8 people stuck around and asked me questions for another hour and a half. Here are some of the images from the lecture and the general points I tried to make. Hover with your cursor for more info. Click on the image to enlarge. You might be able to click again and enlarge even more. Hit the back button to return to the article.
The discussion also included some of the criteria we look for when choosing appropriate treatment materials. These include:
Future Analysis: some materials interfere with microanalysis. We are also concerned with potential kinds of analysis available in the future. Analysis includes examination by scholars. For example, a sail historian told me he needs a fragment of ancient waterlogged sail to remain slightly flexible so he can peek inside the seam and see important clues in the construction and stitching.
Future Treatment: There may be better treatment options in the future, or the treatments we use now might not last as long as we would like. For these reasons, reversibility of the treatment is desired, or at least the potential for re-treatment with something else.
Appropriate Appearance: For study and display, it is important that an artifact look the way curators and other experts say it should.
Age Well: In the museum, we want to preserve these artifacts for hundreds, even thousands of years. The materials we use on artifacts ought to last a long time and not harm the artifact years down the road.
Chemically Compatible: Conservators need to understnad chemistry to know if a proposed treatment material is chemically comaptible with the artifact
Non-Toxic: Conservators don’t want to compromise their health by using toxic materials to treat artifacts. We also don’t want to create poisonous collections. And of course toxic materials need to go somewhere when we are done with them, and we don’t want to pollute the environment.
I concluded the lecture with a brief discussion of the agents of deterioration (light, temperature, humidity, pollutants, handling, pests, and disaster) because no conservation lecture is really complete without touching on them, and the concept of “Agents of Deterioration” is a good one to help the public better care for treasures in their personal collections. Hmmm, that would be a good blog posting, actually….